Why Collectors Break the Law for Beautiful Things
The neuropsychology of taking risks to complete a collection.
Updated May 25, 2026 | Reviewed by Gary Drevitch
In a hotel lobby across from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, a transaction took place that had nothing to do with the usual commerce of its Manhattan neighborhood. A collector met a stranger, exchanged $3,000 in cash, and walked away with a small Chinese teapot that had spent nearly three centuries at the bottom of the South China Sea. The exchange was illegal. Both parties knew it. Neither hesitated.
What compels an otherwise law-abiding person to walk into that kind of risk? The answer is as much neurological as psychological, and it begins with a small structure deep in the brain called the nucleus accumbens.
The "pleasure pathway" does not reward possession. It drives anticipation. Neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp called this the SEEKING circuit, a forward-looking engine that generates urgency and craving in response to the possibility of a reward. For a dedicated collector, the awareness of a gap in a collection triggers this system with the same biochemical force with which hunger triggers the impulse to eat. The teapot was not merely appealing. It represented, as the collector described it, a gap in a carefully constructed historical narrative spanning early Chinese export trade. That gap was felt, physically and cognitively, as an incompleteness that the brain was working to resolve.
This is sometimes called the Zeigarnik effect in cognitive psychology: The brain assigns disproportionate cognitive weight to unfinished tasks and incomplete sets. A collection with a known gap does not sit quietly in the mind. It pulls at our attention . Every related piece encountered becomes a reminder of the missing one. Over time, the gap ceases to feel like a preference and begins to feel like a wound.
Scarcity, Uniqueness, and the Escalation of Value
The teapot in question was not simply rare. It was legally inaccessible. This distinction matters neuropsychologically because prohibition amplifies perceived value through the cognitive distortion known as reactance—the tendency to desire something more intensely when it is restricted. The American embargo on Vietnamese goods, a consequence of the Vietnam War, did not diminish the collector's desire for this piece, part of the Vung Tau cargo . It intensified it. The illegality became part of the object's meaning.
The price the dealer charged, six times what he had paid at auction in Amsterdam, did not register as deterrence but as confirmation of value. The prefrontal cortex, responsible for rational cost-benefit analysis, is routinely overridden in states of high mesolimbic activation. The collector did not weigh $3,000 against risk. The collector weighed the presence of the teapot against the unbearable continuation of its absence.
Identity, Narrative, and the Self Built from Objects
Collectors do not simply acquire things; they construct an identity . The psychological literature on extended self theory, developed by consumer behavior researcher Russell Belk, argues that the objects we accumulate become genuine extensions of who we are. A collection that tells a historical story, as this one did, is not just a display of taste or wealth. It is a coherent argument about meaning, about what the collector believes deserves to be remembered and how.
When a gap in that collection exists, it is not merely an aesthetic inconvenience but a fracture in the self. The missing teapot was not a decorative object the collector happened to want. It was a chapter of a story the collector was determined to tell in full. That psychological investment transforms the calculation entirely. The risk of legal exposure, and the embarrassment of meeting a stranger in a hotel to conduct a transaction the collector would never put in a book, did not register as serious deterrents when weighed against the integrity of their constructed identity.
We do not remember our past actions in fixed terms. We reinterpret them continuously in light of changing context. That purchase, legally prohibited—today it would not be—became in retrospect an act of "historical preservation," ahead of its time even if outside the law of the time.
Such retrospective reframing is supported by research on motivated reasoning , the tendency to construct post hoc justifications for decisions already made on emotional or motivational grounds. The collector did not decide to buy the teapot after a careful ethical analysis. They made the decision with the SEEKING circuit, the Zeigarnik-tormented sense of incompleteness, and the identity-protecting logic of the extended self. The ethical reasoning came later, gently, and arranged itself to accommodate the outcome.
This post is adapted from an interview originally presented at the Indianapolis Women’s Club in 2020. Previously, I published an academic paper on teapots from shipwrecks, including the Vung Tau cargo: Mueller, S. M. (2005). Seventeenth-century Chinese export teapots: Novelty and experimentation. Orientations , 36, 59–65.
Wright, J. S., & Panksepp, J. (2012). An evolutionary framework to understand foraging, desire, and addiction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35 (9), 1893–1901.
Zeigarnik effect Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen [On finished and unfinished tasks]. Psychologische Forschung, 9 , 1–85. An English translation appeared as: Zeigarnik, B. (1938). On finished and unfinished tasks. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology . Harcourt Brace.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 139–168. doi.org/10.1086/209154
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108 (3), 480–498.
Mueller, S. M. (2024, September 10). Collecting with purpose: Completing a set [Magazine article]. Journal of Antiques and Collectibles. journalofantiques.com/columns/the-psychology-of-collecting/collecting-with-purpose-completing-a-set-a-set-embodies-a-higher-good-to-the-collector-than-use-or-as-a-collectible-alone/
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
Shirley M. Mueller, M.D., is a neuroscientist board certified in neurology and psychiatry. She is also an avid collector. Combining these two disciplines, she wrote Inside the Head of a Collector: Neuropsychological Forces at Play.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.