Which of the Five Motivational Profiles Best Describes You?
See how you fit in with motivational psychology’s 5 basic types.
Posted May 30, 2026 | Reviewed by Tyler Woods
There are times when getting out of bed and tackling the day, or just staying focused during a long day, can seem like an almost insurmountable challenge. The weather is beautiful, and you want to enjoy it, or the weather is bad, and you don’t feel like dealing with it. Either way, you have a serious case of the “blah’s.”
In psychology, motivation is often regarded as falling along a set of separate dimensions in which people are high or low in certain qualities. Even the idea that you are motivated (or unmotivated) in tackling particular situations isn’t quite aligned with most of motivational psychology. You might be high in achievement motivation, for example, meaning you want to succeed. Another motivational quality you may rank highly on could be the desire to overpower or dominate others. When psychology identifies variations from person to person in motivation, these qualities are ordinarily treated as separate entities.
Another way of thinking about motivation is that people represent clusters or groupings of particular driving forces. In what’s known as this “person-centered” approach, people are studied in terms of how these motivational qualities cluster together. Now, rather than being seen as high on one quality but low on another, all dimensions are studied to see how they best group together. People can be differentiated, with this approach, according to which cluster most accurately describes them. According to new research, this approach can have distinct advantages in understanding how people differ in their motivational patterns.
Implicit Motives and the Advantage of a Person-Centered Approach
Technical University of Munich’s Farhood Malekzad and colleagues (2026) adopted the person-centered approach in their test of a measure designed to assess “implicit” motives. As the term implies, these are the motives that people don’t say they have when asked directly. Measures of implicit motives provide people with indirect measures. In the case of the U. Munich team, this involved asking people to make up stories in response to prompts and then rating them for motivational themes. This works because people aren't always honest when they're asked to rate their own motivation. Someone might ask you if you are high on the power motive, but you might be reluctant to admit it. However, if you describe the scene in which two people seem to be arguing, you might construct a story that pits one as more dominant compared to the other.
In many ways, the implicit motivational idea, along with the person-centered approach, can be seen as a direct descendant of some of the earliest work in personality psychology. These personologists, as they were known, used a picture-based test of motivation known as the Thematic Apperception Test along with other standard inventories. This was intended to capture the essence of people’s psyches by seeing how all their responses to psychological tests fit together.
You might be wondering why any of this would matter and whether there are real-world consequences of identifying motivational types. Malekzad et al. were indeed interested in finding out how people with different motivational configurations would rate on adaptational outcomes of depressive symptoms, relationship satisfaction, and the tendency to engage in self-criticism.
The Five Implicit Motive Profiles
With this background, it’s time to examine the five patterns that emerged from the person-centered analysis of implicit motives as assessed through the storytelling test. The authors based the five patterns on varying combinations of the motives of affiliation (need to be with others), achievement (wanting to succeed), and power (influencing others through superiority). The over 4,000 individuals who completed the storytelling test ranged from 19 to 70 (average age 35 years).
See which one best fits your motivational profile.
The individuals who fit this pattern are low in intimacy and sociability, high in independence, and high in sense of power. They tend not to be very inhibited. This pattern appeared to have the most favorable outcomes, in part because people who fit this type use consistent ways to meet their needs. They are also unlikely to engage in self-criticism.
- Avoidant-Dependent
These individuals seek to avoid feeling insecure and have a strong independence-seeking streak. In terms of outcomes, they tend to be high on depressiveness and also on self-criticism; their relationship satisfaction is also low.
As the term implies, people with this motivational pattern seek closeness with others as their primary driving force. Their ability to engage in intimacy appears related to positive outcomes scores on relationship satisfaction.
As used in the positive psychology literature, flow is a state of feeling connected to your actions. The people who fit this profile were the highest-flow seeking individuals in the study. They are driven to achievement, but on their own terms.
Driven by a need to avoid failure, people in this group also tended to seek to maintain their independence. When it comes to coping with failure and weakness, they tend to find these challenging, contributing to high depressiveness.
As you think about these brief descriptions, you can see how the three types of motivations weave through each one. However, each alone is not enough to define a given pattern. In predicting the outcome scores. The patterns each proved to have stronger values than individual motivational ratings.
Putting the Patterns to Work
Even without reading the more specific descriptors within each pattern, you can gain an understanding of where you may fit into the set of profiles. Do you feel confident and secure, ready to tackle new challenges? (relaxed agency). Or do you fear failure and, when it occurs, let it penetrate your sense of well-being (stressed agency). Intimacy seekers and the avoidant-dependent clearly differ in their needs to and reasons for connecting with others. Finally, the high-flow patterns don’t worry about what others think as they propel themselves to achieving success. They want to fulfill their own standards.
The implicit motive theory behind the Malekzad et al. study also bears underscoring. If you want to find out your motivational patterns, see how you interpret situations that have no clear script. You can also use the method to understand other people. In the test used in this study, the questions included “What is important for the person in this situation and what is the person doing?,” and “Why does the person feel this way?” See how you, and others, put their own spin on an ambiguous situation.
To sum up , implicit motives can drive our behavior just as strongly as the ones we can identify outright. By learning to see where you might fit into these five motivational types, you can gain insight into what challenges and relationships you seek, and how they can foster your fulfillment.
Malekzad, F., Lang, J. W. B., Kuhl, J., & Quirin, M. (2026). Implicit motive configurations as complements to dimensions: A comparative analysis using latent profile analysis and the operant motive test. Motivation and Emotion . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-026-10225-6
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Ph.D. , is a Professor Emerita of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Her latest book is The Search for Fulfillment.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.