Schadenfreude: The Hidden Fuel of Grievance and Bloodshed
The glee we take in another's downfall.
Posted February 12, 2025 | Reviewed by Monica Vilhauer Ph.D.
Schadenfreude —raw, gnawing, primal—is the secret glee one takes in another's downfall. Harmless in its cocktail-party variety, but let it fester in grievance and rage, and it signals violence. The ticking mind of a would-be shooter, a radicalized zealot, or the scorned office worker poised to strike. Violence germinates in resentment, where the hunger for recognition is denied, and psychopathy ’s cold logic finds an opening. Schadenfreude, literally "damage-joy," is more than just casual amusement—it is a warning sign.
Archetype Imprinting and Schadenfreude
Archetype imprinting shapes how individuals internalize schadenfreude and grievance-based aggression . Psychological research suggests early-life imprinting forms cognitive templates for interpreting power, status, and justice. When these imprints include victimhood or righteous aggression, they lay the groundwork for schadenfreude-fueled violence.
Mass attackers imprint onto the avenger archetype —a figure exacting justice for perceived wrongs. This imprinting is reinforced through media, social narratives, and personal experiences of humiliation or exclusion. Online communities amplify these archetypes, normalizing grievance-based ideologies and reinforcing justification for violent actions.
Schadenfreude, Amour-Propre, and the Psychopathic Mind
Destruction often begins with wounded pride. Rousseau’s amour-propre , that fragile form of self-love reliant on others’ validation, when denied, festers into grievance. Bonhoeffer observed how the humiliated radicalize when dignity is stripped away. This isn’t simple narcissistic injury but a deeper crisis, where aggression is justified as reclaiming lost autonomy.
Individuals motivated by Extreme Overvalued Beliefs (EOBs) will often relish, amplify, and defend their actions. Schadenfreude moves from passive observation to active reinforcement of harm. Relishing suffering, amplifying it through public mockery, and defending violent acts as justice create a triad of escalation, evident in violent offenders who savor suffering and justify its spread.
Schadenfreude and Eating Disorders: Weight Comparisons as Psychological Triggers
Schadenfreude is not limited to violent aggression—it plays a role in psychological harm, particularly in female social dynamics. Research suggests that competitive social environments, especially among adolescent girls, foster weight-based comparisons , where individuals experience schadenfreude when a peer gains weight or fails to meet beauty standards . This phenomenon can be a significant factor in the onset and reinforcement of eating disorders .
Studies indicate that schadenfreude in weight-focused social settings can lead to body dysmorphic reinforcement , where individuals internalize extreme expectations about body image . The intersection of social media , humiliation culture, and status-driven beauty ideals creates an environment where weight fluctuations become spectacles of judgment. Online forums dedicated to thinness often showcase schadenfreude-driven content, mocking weight gain and celebrating extreme dieting behaviors. The toxic validation cycle mirrors the EOB framework in incel terrorists (that claim to be "involuntarily celibate"), as users enjoy body shaming , amplify weight-based criticism, and defend unhealthy body standards.
Taking glee in another girl’s weight gain is a particularly insidious form of schadenfreude that reinforces unhealthy body image standards. The culture of thin privilege in social circles exacerbates these comparisons, where weight gain becomes a social liability and weight loss is glorified. This dynamic can push vulnerable individuals toward extreme dieting, disordered eating behaviors, and long-term psychological distress.
Threat Assessment Models: Schadenfreude as the Psychopath’s Preview
Behavioral threat models help us map roads to destruction. Schadenfreude marks the starting point. Individuals who admire violent actors (mass shooters, terrorists) are not passive spectators—they may be rehearsing. Social media posts filled with gleeful approval of harm signal early warning signs.
Pre-attack behaviors—what experts call "leakage"—are wrapped in schadenfreude. Future assailants do not just plot; they savor. The next school shooter, the dismissed employee with a ledger of enemies, the ISIS zealot seeking holy vengeance—each shares a silent joy in their envisioned reckoning.
Case Studies: Schadenfreude as an Indicator of Threat
Research highlights schadenfreude and grievance-based ideation in violent offenders. Eric Harris, before Columbine, wrote, “I feel like God and I wish I was, because I’d make every single [expletive] afraid of living” (Langman, 2009). His grandiosity and lack of empathy reflect classic psychopathy.
Anders Breivik’s manifesto before the 2011 Norway attacks justified harm with a sense of superiority-- performing Nazi salutes in court. Research shows those who enjoy enemies’ suffering are at higher risk of ideological violence.
Dylann Roof, before the Charleston shooting, fixated over violent imagery and revenge . Studies indicate online radicalization fosters schadenfreude in digital forums before escalating to real-world violence (Neumann, 2013).
Nikolas Cruz, the Parkland shooter, declared online, “I am going to be a professional school shooter,” a clear pre-attack leakage. His fixation on violence and notoriety mirrors cases where schadenfreude-fueled glee escalates into targeted aggression.
Vester Lee Flanagan, who killed two colleagues on live TV, left documents detailing deep resentment and perceived persecution. His case aligns with research on narcissistic injury and violent retaliation (Gilligan, 1997).
Luigi Mangione, accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, inscribed bullets with "delay," "deny," and "depose," a chilling reference to corporate grievances. His act exemplifies the EOB framework —relishing systemic downfall, amplifying grievances into action, and defending his Outlaw archetype fueled violence. Thousands of emojis relished the downfall of the executive—a symbol of our broken healthcare system.
Schadenfreude in the Digital Age: Online Roasting and Toxic Amusement
Modern schadenfreude thrives in online roasting—the culture of mocking and humiliating others for entertainment. The internet turns cruelty into a spectacle, rewarding social validation through likes and shares.
Online roasting taps into thymotic status-seeking , where individuals assert dominance through ridicule. Studies show social media incentivizes schadenfreude-driven aggression, reinforcing in-group identity by humiliating outsiders (Smith et al., 2013). Platforms provide anonymity, making digital aggression more appealing and unchecked (Suler, 2004). Digital harassment research suggests sustained engagement in humiliation culture normalizes cruelty, desensitizing individuals to suffering and making them more accepting of real-world violence (Neumann, 2013).
Conclusion: Recognizing Schadenfreude in Threat Assessment
Understanding how digital culture fuels schadenfreude-driven aggression aids in early detection of threat actors before online amusement turns into offline tragedy. This concept should also be taught in schools and as part of anti- bullying campaigns, when critical archetypes are imprinted .
Van Dijk, W. and Ouwerkerk, JW (2014). Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meloy, J. R., Habermeyer, E., & Guldimann, A. (2015). The warning behaviors of Anders Breivik. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management , 2 (3-4), 164.
Langman, P. (2009). Rampage school shooters: A typology. Aggression and violent behavior , 14 (1), 79-86.
Gilligan, J. (1997). Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic. New York: Random House.
Utley, J. W., Sinclair, H. C., Nelson, S., Ellithorpe, C., & Stubbs-Richardson, M. (2022). Behavioral and psychological consequences of social identity-based aggressive victimization in high school youth. Self and Identity , 21 (1), 61-85.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior , 7 (3), 321-326.
Wang, J., & Zhang, B. (2023). Effects of Aggression, Empathy, and Schadenfreude on Behavior and Thoughts in Violent and Prosocial Video Games. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences , 18 , 97-102.
Schneider, K., Hirsch, S., & Shepherd, M. (1974). The concept of delusion. Themes and Variations in European Psychiatry; Hirsch, SR, Shepherd, M., Eds , 33-39.
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
Tahir Rahman, M.D., is an associate professor of psychiatry at Washington University and the author of Extreme Overvalued Beliefs.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.