Indirect Therapy With Children: A Non-Pathologizing Approach
How changing family interactions can reduce childhood difficulties naturally.
Posted May 26, 2026 | Reviewed by Jessica Schrader
When children present with behavioural, emotional, or relational difficulties, the response of adults is never neutral. The way professionals, parents, schools, and wider systems define the problem shapes not only the intervention itself, but also the child’s developing identity. Childhood is not a fixed psychological state; it is an evolving developmental process. Labels applied during this period can become powerful organising principles that influence how adults interpret behaviour and how children come to understand themselves (Link & Phelan, 2001).
Within strategic and systemic psychotherapy , an alternative model has emerged that seeks to reduce unnecessary pathologisation while maximising effective change: indirect therapy. Rather than positioning the child as the direct recipient of treatment, the therapist works primarily through parents or caregivers, who become the principal agents of intervention. This approach has been explored within the brief strategic tradition by authors such as Giorgio Nardone and other systemic clinicians (Nardone & Portelli, 2005; Portelli, Papantuono, & Gibson, 2016).
Indirect therapy is grounded in pragmatic, ethical, and developmental reasoning. It recognises that children exist within relational systems and that modifying those systems can often produce change more effectively and less intrusively than direct therapeutic intervention with the child.
Defining Indirect Therapy
Indirect therapy refers to interventions in which the individual presenting the difficulty is not the direct recipient of therapy. In childhood cases, this usually means working with parents or caregivers, who implement structured strategies within the child’s everyday environment. Parents are positioned as collaborators or co-therapists and are guided in changing interactional patterns that maintain the difficulty.
This differs significantly from many traditional child psychotherapy approaches that emphasise direct therapeutic engagement through emotional processing, play therapy, cognitive work, or diagnostic assessment. Indirect therapy instead rests on a systemic understanding of behaviour. From this perspective, problems are not viewed as isolated traits existing solely within the child. Behaviour emerges within patterns of interaction. As theorists such as Paul Watzlawick argued, attempted solutions can paradoxically become the mechanisms that maintain the problem (Watzlawick, Weakland, & Fisch, 1974). When relational patterns change, the child’s behaviour frequently changes as well.
Importantly, this principle is supported across multiple therapeutic traditions. Behavioural parent training programmes and parent management interventions consistently demonstrate strong outcomes in reducing childhood behavioural difficulties. Research repeatedly shows that changing parental responses can significantly reduce symptoms without requiring intensive direct therapy with the child (Kaminski & Claussen, 2017; Sanders, 1999).
The Ethical Risk of Pathologisation
One of the strongest arguments for indirect therapy concerns the ethical risks associated with pathologisation. Diagnostic labels can become more than descriptive terms; they may shape perception itself. Once a child is repeatedly described as “anxious,” “oppositional,” or “emotionally dysregulated,” adults may begin interpreting future behaviour primarily through that lens. Expectations narrow, interactions reorganise around the problem identity, and the child may gradually internalise these descriptions as part of their self-concept .
This issue is especially important during childhood because identity formation remains fluid and highly influenced by social feedback. Many childhood behaviours exist on developmental continuums rather than representing fixed disorders. Emotional outbursts, fears, withdrawal, or oppositional behaviour may reflect temporary developmental phases, adaptive responses, or context-dependent coping strategies (Cicchetti & Rogosch, 2002). Prematurely stabilising these experiences into diagnostic identities risks turning transient difficulties into enduring narratives about the self.
Indirect therapy aligns with the ethical principle of minimising harm. Rather than centering the child as “the patient,” the intervention focuses on modifying the relational environment surrounding the child. The child’s identity remains protected while interactional patterns are altered. The emphasis shifts from asking, “What is wrong with the child?” to “What interactions are maintaining the difficulty?”
Avoiding Resistance and Preserving Autonomy
Children, particularly younger children, often experience therapy as something imposed upon them by adults. Even supportive interventions can unintentionally reinforce power imbalances. From a strategic perspective, resistance is not viewed as pathology but as a predictable response to perceived coercion. When children feel scrutinised or pressured to change, opposition, withdrawal, or disengagement may emerge.
Indirect therapy bypasses this dynamic by working through parents rather than directly targeting the child. The child is not required to demonstrate insight, emotional articulation, or compliance. Instead, change occurs indirectly through modifications in the surrounding environment. This frequently creates a paradoxical effect: the less the child feels targeted, the more naturally change occurs.
Research in motivational psychology supports this principle. Autonomy is strongly associated with engagement and behavioural change. When therapy feels imposed, motivation may decrease (Deci & Ryan, 2000). By altering context rather than directly confronting the child, indirect therapy preserves the child’s sense of agency while still facilitating meaningful change.
Empowerment Without Blame
A common misunderstanding of parent-focused therapy is that it blames parents for their child’s difficulties. Effective indirect therapy does the opposite. Parents are not positioned as the cause of pathology but as the most influential agents within the child’s relational system.
Family systems theory has long emphasised circular causality, where behaviours and responses continuously reinforce one another (Minuchin, 1974; Watzlawick et al., 1974). In this framework, identifying blame becomes less useful than identifying patterns that maintain the problem. Effective intervention therefore focuses on changing interactional processes rather than assigning fault.
Research consistently shows that when parents feel competent, collaborative, and supported, therapeutic outcomes improve significantly (Sanders & Kirby, 2014). Indirect therapy strengthens parental efficacy and reduces helplessness. Parents are provided with practical tools and operational strategies that allow them to intervene constructively within everyday family life.
Intervention Within Everyday Life
One of the major strengths of indirect therapy is that intervention occurs within the child’s natural environment. Office-based therapy can sometimes create artificial conditions where therapeutic gains fail to generalise into daily life. In contrast, indirect interventions are implemented during ordinary family interactions such as bedtime routines, homework conflicts, emotional escalations, or social situations.
This increases ecological validity and the durability of change. Parents apply interventions in real time and within the contexts where difficulties actually occur. Research involving childhood anxiety and obsessive-compulsive difficulties further supports this principle. Studies on family accommodation demonstrate that parental reassurance patterns and symptom accommodation can unintentionally maintain anxiety. When parents modify these behaviours through structured guidance, children’s symptoms often decrease significantly even without direct therapeutic work with the child (Lebowitz et al., 2013).
From Causal Diagnosis to Maintaining Processes
Traditional models of childhood intervention often prioritise identifying underlying causes and assigning diagnostic categories. Strategic and systemic approaches adopt a different orientation. Rather than focusing primarily on why the problem exists, they focus on how the problem is currently being maintained.
This reflects broader developments in systemic thinking and complexity science, which emphasise feedback loops over simplistic linear explanations (Hayes & Hofmann, 2020). Problems are viewed as repetitive interactional processes sustained through attempted solutions, relational responses, and behavioural cycles. Indirect therapy operationalises this philosophy by testing hypotheses through intervention within the family system. Change itself becomes a form of assessment.
Indirect therapy offers a clinically rigorous and ethically grounded response to childhood difficulties. By working through parents, avoiding unnecessary pathologisation, and focusing on interactional patterns rather than fixed diagnostic identities, it seeks to minimise harm while maximising effective change.
Research across behavioural parent training, family-based anxiety interventions, and systemic therapy supports the central premise that change in the relational field can produce meaningful change in the child. Rather than placing children at the centre of diagnostic scrutiny, indirect therapy allows transformation to occur relationally, pragmatically, and developmentally.
The child is not defined as disordered; the system is reorganised. Parental competence is strengthened. Functional balance is restored. In a developmental phase characterised by growth and flexibility, such restraint may represent not a limitation, but one of the most ethically sensitive and clinically sophisticated forms of care available.
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2002). A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70 (1), 6–20. Creswell, C., et al. (2014). Parent-led cognitive behavioural therapy for child anxiety disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55 (10), 1132–1142. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227–268. Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2020). Process-based CBT . New Harbinger. Kaminski, J. W., & Claussen, A. H. (2017). Evidence base update for psychosocial treatments for disruptive behaviors. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46 (4), 477–499. Lebowitz, E. R., et al. (2013). Family accommodation in childhood anxiety disorders. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 16 , 1–18. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 , 363–385. Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development . Guilford Press. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy . Harvard University Press. Nardone, G., & Portelli, C. (2005). Knowing through changing . Crown House. Nardone, G., & Watzlawick, P. (2005). Brief strategic therapy . Rowman & Littlefield. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process . Castalia. Sanders, M. R. (1999). Triple P–Positive Parenting Program. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2 (2), 71–90. Sanders, M. R., & Kirby, J. N. (2014). Consumer engagement and the Triple P model. Clinical Psychologist, 18 , 1–11. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution . Norton.
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Padraic Gibson, D.Psych, is a Consultant Clinical Psychotherapist and is the Clinical Director of The OCD Clinic®, and director of Training and Organization Consultation at The Coaching Clinic®, Dublin. He is senior research associate at Dublin City University.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.