How Workplace Chaos Consumes High-Achieving Women

High-conflict dynamics can drain talented women. Here's how to respond.

Posted May 7, 2026 | Reviewed by Jessica Schrader

By Ekaterina Ricci, MLS/MDR, and Bazil Cunningham, JD/MDR

In medicine, autoimmune disease is a failure of recognition. The immune system misidentifies healthy tissue as a threat and launches a sustained attack against the very cells it is meant to protect. The damage is not caused by an external invader, but by the body’s own defense mechanisms operating without appropriate regulation.

Something strikingly similar happens inside organizations.

This post explores "organizational autoimmunity"—how institutions exploit their most capable talent: often high-achieving women. By examining toxic management, ADHD neurobiology, and the "tend-and-befriend" stress response, we expose how systems weaponize female competence to manage chaos created by high-conflict personalities (HCPs).

The Competence Trap in Practice

Consider a company where team members routinely avoid documenting processes or clarifying project roles. When a new employee tries to implement clearer procedures, set boundaries , or ask for defined responsibilities, they are subtly discouraged and degraded as “incompetent,” “disruptive,” “full of excuses,” or “not a team player.”

Consider Mary. She got a new job out of state, but the day-to-day reality was nothing like what she had been sold. Her manager exhibited unchecked high-conflict behaviors. One day he told Mary: “I don’t need to be specific. Just get it done! And fast!” While his instructions were frequently ambiguous and unclear, his hostility was known among staff, which made it difficult to ask for clarity. Distrust permeated all levels of the hierarchy and Mary learned to walk on eggshells.

The organization employs a “Theory X” management style (the assumption employees are inherently irresponsible and must be heavily micromanaged or managed through friction) compared to “Theory Y,” which assumes employees are intrinsically motivated to achieve their goals (Anderson, 2024). This management style allows toxic leaders to avoid accountability and perceive themselves as “unfirable.” In these systems, highly capable people like Mary are not treated as assets to be protected, but rather as endlessly usable defenses—repeatedly activated until exhausted and gone.

Identity and the Medicalization of Competence

Operating in this kind of ambiguity has broader consequences. In many environments, the high-functioning, competent woman is overlooked—not because of a lack of ability, but because her strengths don’t fit neatly into how performance is interpreted.

Traits like intensity, hyperfocus, strong pattern recognition , and a deep sense of responsibility are often misread. Instead of being recognized as strengths, they may be labeled as problems or signs of incompetence. In some cases, they are even pathologized rather than understood in context (Ishii et al., 2023).

Yet many high-functioning women with this profile develop highly stable systems anchored in structure, discipline, scheduling, vigilance, and resilience . These strengths align well with structured environments such as law, medicine, executive leadership , and academia.

These same environments, however, tend to attract another predictable presence: high-conflict personalities, as defined by Bill Eddy, a licensed attorney and therapist. Many HCPs have traits associated with narcissistic , antisocial, or borderline personality disorders . Charming public persona types present a very good public face that masks their negative private behavior, allowing them to climb professional ladders before their patterns become obvious.

When these two profiles—high-functioning women and HCPs—intersect, the outcome is chaotic with an often irreversible impact.

Why Chaos Hits Differently and the Rescue Reflex

For a high-achieving woman who depends on carefully engineered structure, chaos created by high-conflict personalities destabilizes the systems she relies on to stay focused and regulated.

In healthy environments, this approach is adaptive. In dysfunctional organizations, it is exploited. The woman becomes an emotional container and an unofficial stabilizer for others. Instead of being supported by structure, she is expected to replace it. Her strengths are redirected away from strategy and toward constant maintenance.

In 2000, psychologist Shelley E. Taylor introduced the “tend-and-befriend” model—a stress response more commonly observed in women (Taylor et al., 2000). Rather than fight or flee, many respond by nurturing relationships and trying to keep the environment calm and predictable.

This dynamic also has a biological dimension. Research shows that emotional regulation can be more challenging in adults with ADHD, particularly under stress (Soler-Gutiérrez et al., 2023). Instead of remaining detached from interpersonal strain, emotional responses may intensify in unstable environments.

Over time, the Rescue Reflex breaks down. What was meant to stabilize the system begins to deplete the individual instead.

Organizational Responsibility and the Path Forward

Individual women cannot fix this alone. These patterns are reinforced by systems that tolerate weak boundaries and lack accountability—conditions that allow high-conflict dynamics to take hold. Over time, this creates emotional volatility, placing greater pressure on the most capable individuals to step in and stabilize the environment.

Real change requires structure. Clear expectations and predictable routines are essential—not only for performance, but for emotional regulation (Nordby et al., 2024). Without them, individuals are left to absorb the strain themselves.

So what can a high-achieving woman do within a system that hasn’t corrected itself? The shift is from reflexive rescue to deliberate boundaries. When an HCP creates chaos, the instinct is to smooth things over. But repeated rescue only masks the underlying problem. The real work is to limit exposure and return responsibility to the system.

Apply the SLIC Framework, a two-and-a-half-step method designed to break conflict loops:

While individual boundaries offer immediate survival, advocating for systemic improvements remains essential. Without boundaries, organizations erode the very conditions required for excellence. With them, high-performing individuals stay focused, effective, and resilient—even when the surrounding system has yet to learn how.

Anderson, R. (2024, June 7). How a 60-Year-Old management theory can help rejuvenate offices. Forbes . forbes.com/sites/ryananderson/2024/06/06/how-a-60-year-old-management-theory-can-help-rejuvenate-offices/

Eddy, B. (2019, May 15). Who are high conflict people? High Conflict Institute . highconflictinstitute.com/who-are-high-conflict-people/

Ishii, S., Takagi, S., Kobayashi, N., Jitoku, D., Sugihara, G., & Takahashi, H. (2023). Hyperfocus symptom and internet addiction in individuals with attention‑deficit/hyperactivity disorder trait. Frontiers in Psychiatry , 14, 1127777. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1127777

Nordby, E. S., Guribye, F., Schønning, V., Andersen, S. L., Kuntsi, J., & Lundervold, A. J. (2024). A blended intervention targeting emotion dysregulation in adults with attention‑deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Development and feasibility study. JMIR Formative Research , 8, e53931. doi.org/10.2196/53931

Soler-Gutiérrez, A. M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Mayas, J. (2023). Evidence of emotion dysregulation as a core symptom of adult ADHD: A systematic review. PloS One , 18(1), e0280131. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280131

Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend‑and‑befriend, not fight‑or‑flight. Psychological Review , 107(3), 411–429. doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411

Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email

There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.

By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Ekaterina Ricci, MDR/MLS, is a conflict-resolution expert and legal consultant with a scientific background in Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics.

Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.

This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.