How Much Do Your Sex Chromosomes Really Determine?
Inspecting a century-long mix-up between correlation and causation.
Updated November 12, 2025 | Reviewed by Tyler Woods
Here’s a quick reality check: ice cream sales go up in summer, and so do drownings. But no one thinks Ben & Jerry's is a silent killer. It’s correlation, not causation.
Yet this same logical blunder—the confusion of correlation with causation—has fooled even scientists for more than a century.
In the late 1800s, French demographer Louis-Adolphe Bertillon compared death rates by marital status across Europe and triumphantly declared that married men live longer. His conclusion gave birth to the " marriage protection hypothesis"—the idea that marriage itself somehow lengthens your lifespan.
It took decades to realize that the relationship was purely statistical. Marriage didn’t cause longevity; it merely correlated with it. Healthier, wealthier, more stable men were simply more likely to get—and stay—married. It was correlation dressed up as causation, wearing a wedding ring.
A similar misunderstanding still haunts biology and all the related fields today. This time, the culprit isn't marriage—it’s the so-called sex chromosome.
In the early 1900s, American biologist Nettie Stevens was peering down her microscope at mealworms at Bryn Mawr College when she noticed something remarkable. Males had one tiny chromosome that females lacked. In her 1905 paper, she wrote:
"Since the somatic cells of the female contain 20 large chromosomes, while those of the male contain 19 large ones and one small one, this seems to be a clear case of sex-determination" (Stevens, 1905).
Her discovery, mirrored by the work of Edmund Beecher Wilson that same year (Wilson, 1905), revolutionized genetics . The "X" and "Y" chromosomes became forever branded as sex chromosomes—the presumed arbiters of maleness and femaleness.
But just as Bertillon mistook marital bliss for longevity, we mistook a correlation for a cause. But falsehood could not survive the reality check by modern science.
Fast forward a century. Thanks to molecular genetics and developmental biology, we now know that sex determination is not the work of a single chromosome pair, but a vast genetic network—a biochemical symphony involving more than 50 players—genes (Bashamboo & McElreavey, 2016; Bouty et al. 2020).
Sure, the SRY gene on the Y chromosome can start the process that leads to testis development (Sinclair et al., 1990; Koopman et al., 1991). But many of the crucial steps happen elsewhere in the genome. Here are some examples:
In other words, most genes involved in shaping our reproductive anatomy are scattered across the genome; only a few are confined to the X and Y.
So why do we still call them "sex chromosomes"? Largely because in most people, having XY aligns with developing male anatomy and XX with female anatomy. But that's correlation—not causation. Plenty of exceptions exist: individuals with XX chromosomes who develop testes, or XY individuals who develop ovaries, all depending on subtle changes in those genes (Bashamboo & McElreavey, 2016, Bouty et al., 2020).
The "sex chromosome" label is therefore a scientific misnomer—a historical relic of early genetics, not an accurate reflection of biological reality. The chromosomes don’t determine sex; they merely correlate with it.
It’s time we retire the century-old myth that the X and Y chromosomes single-handedly decides who's male or female. Modern biology paints a far richer picture—one in which sex emerges from the interaction of dozens of genes, hormones , and developmental pathways.
If ice cream doesn't cause drowning and marriage doesn't grant immortality (metaphorically speaking), then sex chromosomes don't determine sex. They're just along for the ride.
Bashamboo, A., & McElreavey, K. (2016). “Human sex-determination and disorders of sex development (DSD).” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology , 60, 118–126.
Bouty, A., Ayers, K., & Sinclair, A. (2020) “The Molecular Basis of Sex Determination and Differentiation: Implications for Understanding DSD." In Disorders| Differences of Sex Development: An Integrated Approach to Management , pp. 13-26. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Koopman, P., Gubbay, J., Vivian, N., Goodfellow, P., & Lovell-Badge, R. (1991). “Male development of chromosomally female mice transgenic for Sry .” Nature , 351, 117–121.
Sinclair, A. H., et al. (1990). “A gene from the human Y chromosome encodes a member of a novel family of embryonically expressed genes.” Nature , 346, 240–244.
Stevens, N. M. (1905). Studies in spermatogenesis, with especial reference to the “accessory chromosome.” Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication No. 36.
Wilson, E. B. (1905). “Studies on chromosomes. II. The paired microchromosomes, idiochromosomes and heterotropic chromosomes in Hemiptera.” Journal of Experimental Zoology , 2(3), 321–336.
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Lixing Sun, Ph.D. , is a distinguished research professor in behavior and evolution at Central Washington University.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.