From Asylums to Prisons and Jails: A Failed Social Policy
The unforeseen consequences of the deinstitutionalization movement in America.
Posted July 4, 2024 | Reviewed by Devon Frye
The number of incarcerated individuals in the United States with psychological or psychiatric disorders has been steadily increasing since the mid-1950s, with the upsurge stemming specifically from the deinstitutionalization movement that gained considerable momentum throughout the nation, particularly in the 1960s.
While well-intended, the movement did not produce the desired expectations. In large part because of the deinstitutionalization movement, I argue that our nation’s jails and prisons have effectively become “the new asylums,” the de facto state psychiatric hospitals, responsible for confining and caring for mentally ill offenders ( Pittaro, 2015 ).
As I have publicly addressed on many occasions, prisons and jails were never designed nor intended to serve in this capacity. And despite vast improvements made over the last decade, our correctional system is still ill-equipped to effectively supervise the many men and women whose needs far exceed what corrections can adequately provide.
The closing of most state psychiatric hospitals shifted the focus of mental health care in the United States, which led to a significant influx of mentally ill individuals entering communities that were and, to a significant extent, still are, ill-equipped to handle individuals with such pressing needs. As a result, many became homeless or wound up in prison or jail, a trend that has continued to this day. Today, nearly half the people in U.S. jails and more than a third of those in U.S. prisons have been diagnosed with a mental illness—not to mention the prevalence of co-occurring addiction , which increases the likelihood of criminal justice involvement ( Yohanna, 2013 ).
Many of those deinstitutionalized and released into the community did not improve, despite the new medications that were available to them. Instead, most migrated to underfunded communities that were ill-equipped to manage their unique issues. Eventually, many who were released spiraled into despair and homelessness; a large number subsequently became entangled within the criminal justice system, mostly for public nuisance/disorder offenses. As they say, the rest is history.
To further illustrate this point, three of the nation’s largest jails (Rikers, LA County, and Cook County) are providing largely uncontrolled psychiatric care for individuals who would be better served in psychiatric facilities ( Nishar, 2020 ). To compound matters, the research has consistently shown that being incarcerated in a correctional facility is far more likely to worsen, not lessen, the mental health conditions of those individuals, which suggests that when they are eventually released into society, their psychiatric issues will have likely intensified rather than weakened. Therefore, the likelihood of being reincarcerated shortly after release from confinement is incredibly high.
Inmates with mental illness, whether pretrial or convicted, present numerous challenges to correctional staff and management . For instance, mentally ill inmates may engage in self-harming behavior, such as self-mutilation or the intentional ingestion of nonedible items, that then require medical intervention, or disrupt or frighten other inmates with bizarre and inappropriate behavior and outbursts ( Treatment Advocacy Center, 2018 ). This particular population of inmates may also be prone to aggression , violence, or bizarre, threatening outbursts, particularly if they suffer from delusions or what DeAngelis, (2022 ) refers to as “command hallucinations,” telling them to hurt others.
Mentally ill inmates are also more likely to be victimized by other inmates, are more likely than inmates without mental illness to be placed in solitary confinement, and are more likely than inmates without mental illness to attempt or die by suicide . Mentally ill inmates also tend to stay incarcerated longer than non-mentally ill inmates, which contributes to jail and prison overcrowding. Reasons for these longer stays include difficulty in understanding and following institutional rules and being held in a correctional institutions while waiting for a psychiatric hospital bed to become available.
A consensus exists among criminal justice practitioners, especially those who work in corrections, that individuals who are severely mentally ill belong in hospitals, not prisons or jails. However, the reality of the situation is that offenders with severe mental illness are currently more likely to occupy a bed inside a correctional institution than one in a psychiatric hospital. Until the nation’s mental health system is realigned to better serve individuals with severe mental illness who break the law, this unfortunate trend will continue.
As a starting point in rectifying the issue, the Treatment Advocacy Center presents the following recommendations:
While not an exhaustive list, it can be used as a starting point in generating further discussion, but more importantly, shed light on a societal problem that will only continue to worsen.
DeAngelis, T. (2022, July 11). Mental illness and violence: Debunking myths, addressing realities. Monitor on Psychology 52 (3): 31. Retrieved June 30, 2024 from www.apa.org/monitor/2021/04/ce-mental-illness
Nishar, S. (2020, July). The legacy of deinstitutionalization. Retrieved June 30, 2024 from The Legacy of “Deinstitutionalization” | Mental Health America (mhanational.org)
Pittaro, M. (2015, December 7). The challenge of incarcerating mentally ill inmates. Shawano, WI: Wisconsin Jail Association. Retrieved June 30, 2024, from www.wjawi.org/2016/01/20/the-challenges-of-incarcerating-mentally-ill-inmates/
Treatment Advocacy Center. (2018). The treatment of persons with mental illness in prisons and jails: A state survey. Arlington, VA: Treatment Advocacy Center. Retrieved June 30, 2024, from www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/storage/documents/treatment-behind-bars…
Yohanna, D. (2013, October). Deinstitutionalization of people with mental illness: Causes and consequences. Retrieved June 30, 2024, from Deinstitutionalization of People with Mental Illness: Causes and Consequences | Journal of Ethics | American Medical Association (ama-assn.org)
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Dr. Michael Pittaro is an Associate Professor of Criminal Justice at American Military University and serves as a Director of Corrections.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.