False Necessities: How We Rationalize Our Choices
We tell ourselves we "need" to do certain things. Is that true?
Updated October 11, 2023 | Reviewed by Devon Frye
My friends and I frequently joke that a lot of the issues we deal with are “first-world” problems. That is, choosing paint colors for the living room, fixing the car’s dented fender, and finding an affordable vacation spot are very small concerns when one considers the challenges most people in the world face every day.
Despite that flicker of moral insight, we quickly return to the problem at hand. Somehow, we must find a way to get Junior into that school he (read, we ) wants to go to. Because life is short and precious, those kitchen countertops need to go. So does that tiny (32”) television. Neither of us is getting any younger. We should buy that RV now.
Part of the charm of humans is that we can commit ourselves to these discretionary ventures just as we address more fundamental ones. Telling ourselves—and our significant others—that we simply “must” do something is mostly a way of shouting down our own uncertainties and perhaps, their opposing views.
This rhetorical bombast doesn’t keep us from sleepless nights. Some portion of that tossing and turning focuses on the goal at hand: whether to make changes to our house or move to another; go back to school; quit the current job and look for a better one, and so forth. Much more restlessness, I believe, is devoted to the technicalities of the change. What are the potential difficulties? Can we really pull this off? What will our friends and family think?
This post, then, is about what it means to “need” something and how to discern when our decision-making about this issue becomes faulty. When do our “reasons” become “rationalizations”?
There are many lists of basic human needs in psychology and the self-help professions. All stress that individuals require certain kinds of resources and activities to live and function well. The authors emphasize that mere survival is not enough. Humans should also thrive, that is, expand their interests and commitments in ways that enrich the self.
Abraham Maslow presented in 1943 what is still the best-known model of individual needs. His initial formulation has five basic needs arranged as a pyramid. Most fundamental, and thus at the pyramid’s base, are physiological needs (air, food and water, shelter, sleep, and the like). Just above that are safety needs (protections that give security, predictability, and control to life). Higher yet is the need for love and belonging , the drive to be part of relationships and groups.
Support and belonging, though, are not enough. Maslow’s fourth level is esteem , the quest for recognition and respect, both from oneself and others. Fifth, and finally, is the stage of self-actualization , essentially, the commitment to personal growth and fulfillment of potential. Ideally, all of us should find ways to express ourselves creatively and otherwise make contributions to the world.
In 1971, Maslow added three levels to his pyramid. Newly positioned between esteem and self-actualization are cognitive needs (commitments to knowledge and understanding) and aesthetic needs (appreciation of beauty and form). And the eighth, and top, level becomes transcendence (relationship-building with nature, culture, and the human community).
Maslow’s general point is that “needs” are of different types and levels of urgency. After we meet our most basic survival requirements, we go about “feathering our nests.” But self-centered decoration is not the endpoint for the worthiest, or most fulfilling, lives. Ultimately, actualization means connection to the world around us.
I should note that some psychologists consider this model of “needs” to be too broad. In that sense, they distinguish between needs, wants, urges, and desires. We may feel the urge to have sex , but is it really a need? We require shelter from the cold, but does that mean adding a new primary suite onto the house? Such is the theme of this post.
One of the biases of psychology is its emphasis on the personal causes and consequences of behavior. To be sure, most choices we make are filtered through our perceptions of the issues at hand. However, many times, we do things for the sake of others.
Few of us are so self-centered as to disregard the needs of our loved ones. Likewise, we listen to our friends and do what we can to help them. Most of us also acknowledge that the wider community, even society itself, has needs. In that spirit, we observe traffic laws, pay taxes, and refrain from dumping trash wherever we like. The best and wisest of us, as Maslow describes, commit at least some portion of our lives to helping those who exist beyond our immediate social circles.
All this sounds noble. However, our offers of help are commonly expressions of what we think is good for those needy people. Sometimes, our behaviors help us acquire those (fourth level) feelings of esteem Maslow identifies. Other sorts of self-interest intrude. Indeed, many of our behaviors are obligations, both interpersonal and public. If you don’t observe traffic laws, pay taxes, and refrain from dumping trash wherever you want, you’ll pay a price.
Reasons and Rationalizations
Clearly, decision-making is complicated and fed by many sources of motivation . More to the point, it seems that any decision we make can be portrayed as fulfilling some sort of need, at least according to Maslow’s expanded vision of how we should live. Maybe getting those new drapes for the living room is an expression of our aesthetic need? Vacationing on the Mexican coast will be a time for relationship-building and personal growth.
Dependably ingenious, we humans justify most things. What are some issues that might help us frame our decision-making more clearly?
The reader may feel that this post is an attempt to paralyze decision-making and rob it of its spontaneity and joy. Not at all. Most of life’s small decisions can be made in immediate, zestful ways. But the big ones—that affect other people and our own long-term possibilities—should be the products of reason rather than rationalization.
Maslow, A. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review , 50 (4): 370-396.
Maslow, A. (1971). The Farther Reaches of Human Nature . NY: Viking Press.
Vermani, M. (2022). How to Separate Your Wants from Your Needs. Psychology Today. (posted November 22, 2022).
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Thomas Henricks, Ph.D., is Danieley Professor of Sociology and Distinguished University Professor at Elon University.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.