Coregulation: How Self-Soothing Actually Develops
As a parent in coregulation, you’re not a “crutch,” you’re a scaffold.
Posted June 3, 2026 | Reviewed by Monica Vilhauer Ph.D.
"Hi…um, I'm worried because my six-week-old just does not know how to self-soothe. He needs me to hold him, and if I let him cry, he just can't calm down on his own. What am I doing wrong?"
To read most sleep advice, it would seem that teaching a baby to self-soothe is the most important task of parenting —and if parents don't establish this skill right from the start, their child could struggle for years. Parents are warned that rocking or feeding a baby to sleep puts a full stop on the child's ability to do it themselves. Expert advice submits that crying (even intensely or for a decent period of time) followed by falling asleep means that the baby has “learned to self-soothe.”
When you examine this from a developmental perspective, it's curious. Nowhere else in childrearing do we tell parents that the only way a child learns is in the absence of help. We don't hand a child a bike and say, "I can't help you or you'll never learn." No—parents hold on for dear life, then gradually let go as the child starts to find their balance. They don’t stay totally hands off, and they don't keep hanging on. It's a dance between capacity and growth.
This is what self-soothing advice consistently misses: development and capacity . The ability to tolerate and manage distress is not a given but grows with the brain and nervous system (Gee, 2016).
The Theory Behind Self-Soothing Advice
Self-soothing advice is rooted in behaviorism —a theory from the 1920s that holds that babies arrive as blank slates, shaped entirely by which behaviors are reinforced. If you respond to a crying baby, the thinking goes, you're teaching them that crying “works.” The problem is that behaviorism does not consider biology, development, or temperament as relevant. It puts enormous pressure on parental behavior and ignores most of what actually influences behavior.
What "Self-Soothing" Actually Requires
Self-soothing means being able to do something for yourself that helps you move from distress back to calm. That's not a single skill or a switch—it requires the ability to detect and evaluate a stressor, access a coping strategy (either from the self or a caregiver ), and assess whether it worked. Adults have many options: take a walk, call a friend, or go to a movie — all of which require mature cognitive, attentional, and motor abilities.
Infant brains are still building the architecture that makes any of this possible. The younger the baby, the fewer abilities they have. A swaddled newborn can't get their hand to their mouth. Beyond this one strategy, they don’t have any other options. Falling asleep, then, technically isn’t self-soothing; it's their only alternative.
The Development of Self-Soothing Capacity, Month by Month
The capacity to manage distress follows a specific developmental path.
In the first three months, babies are almost entirely at the mercy of their physiology. Around six to eight weeks, the visual cortex comes online, and babies become far more alert—and far more easily overwhelmed (Chugani, 1998; Schore, 2003). Their coping options are limited to turning away, sucking, closing their eyes, or sleeping (Kopp, 1989).
By three to four months , the social smile emerges, and babies gain slightly more voluntary control over attention and movement (Sroufe, 1997). They can briefly redirect themselves—but only when distress is low. Once crying escalates past a certain threshold, even these limited tools go offline (Kopp, 1989).
Six months to a year, frontal lobe development enables babies to anticipate, understand cause and effect, and shift attention more deliberately (Schore, 2003; Sroufe, 1997). They can find a pacifier, rub a lovey, and remember that a parent who left the room will return. The repertoire expands—but it takes time.
Beyond a year, the ability to intentionally shift behavior and manage higher levels of distress continues to unfold and mature. Brain structures necessary for true emotional regulation take a few years to really develop.
Parents Are Not a Crutch. They Are Infrastructure.
Here's the paradigm shift that decades of developmental research support: In the first year, a parent's soothing is not a problem for the baby's regulation. It is the baby's regulation.
Caregivers serve as what researchers call "external organizers" of the infant's developing stress -response system (Spangler et al., 1994). When parents respond to distress that exceeds their child's capacity, they aren't “creating bad habits” or spoiling. They're acting as a guide through regulation—showing the child what it feels like to move from upset to calm, from overwhelmed to settled within the context of connection. Assistance helps support and calibrate the child's nervous system. It’s a strength, not a “problem.”
That doesn't mean parents need to respond to every single cry. What matters is stepping in when distress exceeds what this baby can manage at this point in development.
I'll go out on a limb and say: There is no learning happening when a child is hysterical and doesn't get help to calm down. Learning really happens when frustration is manageable.
Temperament Changes Everything
Not all babies are working with the same window of tolerance. Research consistently shows that temperamentally sensitive or reactive babies have physiologically different stress responses—higher baseline cortisol, greater reactivity, and more difficulty reducing their own distress (Calkins et al., 2002; Fox & Calkins, 2003). For these infants, what registers as mild frustration for another baby may be a significant and challenging event (Williamson & Anzalone, 2000). If your baby is quicker to escalate and harder to soothe, that's neurobiology—not “failing at self-soothing.”
What This Means for Parents Right Now
There is nothing wrong with helping soothe your baby when they need it. Research on preventing sleep problems through early self-soothing training shows only modest, short-lived gains (Fangupo et al., 2021; Stremler et al., 2013). Self-soothing skills unfold naturally as the brain develops, and parents continue scaffolding with manageable doses of frustration over the first few years of life.
Let's shift the focus from "self-soothing" to coregulation —where soothing happens in a relationship, not in isolation.
Calkins, S. D., Dedmon, S. E., Gill, K. L., Lomax, L. E., & Johnson, L. M. (2002). Frustration in infancy: Implications for emotion regulation, physiological processes, and temperament. Infancy, 3 (2), 175–197.
Chugani, H. T. (1998). Biological basis of emotions: Brain systems and brain development. Pediatrics, 102 (5), 1225-1229.
Davidson, R. J., Jackson, D. C., & Kalin, N. H. (2000). Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (6), 890-909.
Fangupo, L. J., Haszard, J. J., Reynolds, A. N., Lucas, A. W., McIntosh, D. R., Richards, R., Camp, J., Galland, B. C., Smith, C., & Taylor, R. W. (2021). Do sleep interventions change sleep duration in children aged 0-5 years? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sleep Medicine Reviews , 59 , 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101498
Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (2003). The development of self-control of emotion: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences. Motivation & Emotion, 27 (1), 7-26.
Gee, D. G. (2016). Sensitive periods of emotion regulation: Influences of parental care on frontoamygdala circuitry and plasticity. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , 2016 (153), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20166
Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology , 18 (2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.2.199
Schore, A. (2003). Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. Norton.
Spangler, G., Schieche, M., Ilg, U., Maier, U., & Ackermann, C. (1994). Maternal sensitivity as an external organizer for biobehavioral regulation in infancy. Developmental Psychobiology, 27 (7), 425–437.
Stremler, R., Hodnett, E., Kenton, L., Lee, K., Weiss, S., Weston, J., & Willan, A. (2013). Effect of behavioural-educational intervention on sleep for primiparous women and their infants in early postpartum: Multisite randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) , 346 , f1164. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1164
Williamson, G. G., & Anzalone, M. E. (2000). Sensory integration and self-regulation in infants and toddlers: Helping very young children interact with their environment. Zero to Three.
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.