Are You Bullying on Social Media Without Realizing It?
Online bullying: Self-awareness and change can improve your digital presence.
Posted May 26, 2026 | Reviewed by Jessica Schrader
Most people who behave cruelly online do not think of themselves as cruel, and in fact may not be especially so. Subjectively, they may be speaking from a sense of conviction, righteousness, or simply what feels like playful competition .
Give Us This Day Our Daily Dread
As a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst active online and in my work, I have spent years watching and being directly impacted by how ordinary people account for harm they cause—usually, they feel they are in the right. Often, they believe they are doing what is best. Sometimes, there is a tinge of enjoyment, especially if justified and rationalized ethically and morally. Some days, going online feels like a risky proposition, particularly if one of the more persistent low-level proto-trolls has latched on to some idea. How to handle that, I've discussed in my work on BRODA, a common set of moves on socials: bait, refuse open dialogue, attack. There is often a theme of the alleged troll expressing being victimized, falsely accused, shifting to a personal register, flipping blame (DARVO), and the like.
Wrongdoing more generally was once imagined to be the work of a few deviants, evil people. After WWII, when perfectly lovely neighbors turned a blind eye, or worse, the explanation became less clear, more troubling, and easy to ignore. More people than we'd like to imagine, under conditions like anonymity, can slip into everyday evil: given a crowd, perceived distance from the target, and a cause that makes the attack feel like justice. Famous mid-20th-century experiments paint a clearer portrait—Milgram's obedience studies, Zimbardo's prison simulation, contested as they now are, pointed at the same uncomfortable thing. The numbers do as well. This type of behavior is context-dependent, and people who think they'd never act so are often surprised, or they don't notice... even when confronted with the facts.
Pathological narcissism is relatively uncommon, hovering between 1% and 6% of people, depending on the study. The darker traits it travels with—manipulation, callousness, the appetite for others' pain—are more rare, shading off into a thin tail rather than marking out a population. Even granting the occasional claim that a third of online trolls score high on those traits, the sheer volume of everyday cruelty online isn't exclusively coming from those folks.
A consistent pattern of behaving this way rarely arrives all at once. It sets in by degrees, the way some diseases do—a symptom here, easily explained away, then another, until one day the realization breaches. A history of being victimized, perhaps; personality traits like narcissism and neuroticism , not fully set but predisposing; the more anonymous, detached perch social media affords, and the vigilante mentality that comes with it; a resentful alter ego discharging retaliatory impulses repressed elsewhere in a life. There are many factors—though I've watched a handful of people online earnestly argue that bullying is good for you, that it builds toughness, and then bully instrumentally on that logic.
With insidious onset, insight fails early and under the radar. Someone who knew, in the moment, that they were being cruel might simply stop—though sometimes there is a callousness cloaked in the more stoic philosophies. This lighter bullying can't stop because there's nothing to stop, only a series of reasonable responses to people who deserved it.
There are reasons this happens, and a measure of compassion is useful. Harm travels down the generations; people who were hurt are more likely to hurt, and the pattern repeats through blindness more than decision. But the same research that shows the cycle shows it isn't a given—most of those treated badly do not go on to perpetrate. Etiology is not destiny. What lets the pattern hide is moral disengagement: the running commentary that reframes each cruelty as fairness, accountability, a joke, a defense. Compassion doesn't excuse the behavior, and neither does clinically significant trauma —but compassion, for oneself and others, is what makes it possible to challenge hurtful norms effectively.
The genuine sadist —the true troll—acts with eyes wide open. No slow onset, no failure of insight, no symptom ignored. They know exactly what they're doing and enjoy it, and innocence is useful camouflage: a wolf in the proverbial sheep's clothing.
Five Questions for Self-Appraisal
Drawing on the literature below, five self-reflective questions stand out for spotting whether bullying—or near-bullying—behaviors have crept in. They borrow from tested rating scales but are not themselves a validated instrument.¹ Worth noting before you start: when these patterns get named mid-argument, things can get spicy. Met with a sincere "I feel like you're crossing a line, please stop," some back off and some advance. And defensiveness, it should be said, is not by itself an admission of guilt .
Hopefully, these types of questions are useful, if not fully welcomed. I shared a few online, and got mixed responses. Who would answer these questions honestly? Interestingly, research has found that at least with narcissism, people are likely to disclose being narcissistic based on a single question: "To what extent do you agree with this statement: 'I am a narcissist'?" (Konrath et al., 2014).
Next steps, if anything rings a meaningful bell, are to collect more information, observing one's own behavior and asking safe and trusted loved ones, and do one's own research. These five questions are not definitive or diagnostic, but can show up yellow (or even red) flags. People can and do change these patterns, and often feel better about themselves and enjoy healthier relationships. Sometimes the assistance of a professional can be useful, or even necessary, but many things we can shift with self-awareness and consistency.
- This framework is an unvalidated derivative designed for conceptual self-reflection. It is synthesized from established behavioral criteria found in peer-reviewed cyberbullying and peer-perpetration research. It is not a validated psychometric tool, a clinical diagnosis, or medical advice, but is based in evidence and may serve some use. If any of the questions raise significant concern, it is appropriate to seek further consultation with a qualified professional.
Brenner, G. H. (2026, January 27). How victimization may be grounded in narcissism. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/202601/how-victimization-may-be-grounded-in-narcissism
Brenner, G. H. (2020, January 23). The adult impact of childhood abuse, neglect and bullying. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/202001/the-adult-impact-childhood-abuse-neglect-and-bullying
Brenner, G. H. (2022, August 15). The anatomy of everyday evil. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/202208/the-anatomy-of-everyday-evil
Brenner, G. H. (2021, May 3). The broad impact of school bullying, and what must be done. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/202105/the-broad-impact-school-bullying-and-what-must-be-done
Brenner, G. H. (2021, July 26). Gen Z and workplace bullying, ghosting, and cancel culture. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/202107/gen-z-and-workplace-bullying-ghosting-and-cancel-culture
Brenner, G. H. (2026, April 22). The intergenerational transmission of parenting. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/202604/the-intergenerational-transmission-of-parenting
Brenner, G. H. (2019, August 5). What makes internet trolls tick? Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/201908/what-makes-internet-trolls-tick
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (2), 364–374. The cognitive machinery — moral justification, euphemism, diffusion of responsibility — that lets each cruelty feel like fairness. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2 (2-3), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v02n02_08
Farrington, D. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and Justice, 17 , 381–458. The Cambridge Study finding that bullies tend to raise bullies — and the same data showing the majority do not. Where "etiology is not destiny" gets its arithmetic. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/449217
Konrath, S., Meier, B. P., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Development and Validation of the Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS). PLoS ONE , 9 (8), e1033469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103469
Le Texier, T. (2019). Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 74 (7), 823–839. Why Zimbardo's prison simulation should be cited with care — the participants were coached, the "findings" partly staged. Included here because the caveat is part of the point. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000401
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67 (4), 371–378. The obedience experiments — read now alongside their critics, but still the starting point for any honest reckoning with how far most of us will go when the situation gives permission. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
Olweus, D. (1996). The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center), University of Bergen.
Parada, R. H. (2000). Adolescent Peer Relations Instrument: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of participant roles in bullying and victimization of adolescence: An interim test manual and a research monograph: A test manual. Publication Unit, Self-concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation (SELF) Research Centre, University of Western Sydney.
ExperiMentations Blog Post (“Our Blog Post”) is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice. We will not be liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on information obtained through Our Blog Post. Please seek the advice of professionals, as appropriate, regarding the evaluation of any specific information, opinion, advice, or other content. We are not responsible and will not be held liable for third-party comments on Our Blog Post. Any user comment on Our Blog Post that, in our sole discretion, restricts or inhibits any other user from using or enjoying Our Blog Post is prohibited and may be reported to Sussex Publishers/Psychology Today.
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Grant Hilary Brenner, M.D., a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, helps adults with mood and anxiety conditions, and works on many levels to help unleash their full capacities and live and love well.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.