6 Ways Schools Undermine Autistic Students' Self-Advocacy
A new study explored autistic self-advocacy but found systems-level ableism.
Posted March 19, 2026 | Reviewed by Gary Drevitch
A new study published in Autism delivers findings that validate what many autistic self-advocates have felt in their bones: Autistic students struggle to advocate for themselves in school and to request and obtain the support they need. Regardless of individual self-advocacy skills, systemic factors keep them back. Not just individual teachers or principals, but the entire structures of meaning, mattering, and management make the autistic experience difficult.
An autistic and neurodivergent team—Nicole Nadwodny, Ben VanHook, Brady Esham, Luna N Larsen, Sarah Levinson, and Abbey Eisenhower— set out to examine how K–12 school experiences shaped the self-advocacy of autistic students. In a community-focused design, 19 autistic adolescents and adults in the US participated in 90-minute semi-structured interviews about their K–12 school experiences. Key findings pointed to common systemic and structural issues experienced by participants. The analysis distilled common barriers to six factors: erasure, conformity , isolation, oppression, hidden expectations, and authority.
The Core Finding: It’s the System
The research team expected to learn which conditions helped autistic students advocate for themselves. Instead, participants kept focusing the conversation on a fundamental obstacle: Their schools were not structurally conducive to autistic self-advocacy.
The core theme that emerged from the analysis was that individual educators, even well-meaning ones, cannot dismantle ableism baked into institutional foundations. Participants described encountering barriers not so much from bad actors but from the ordinary operation of school systems.
6 Obstacles To Autistic Students' Self-Advocacy
The analysis of participants' reports suggested that barriers clustered into six categories.
How to Support Autistic Students' Self-Advocacy
The study's implications for practice are direct. School-based interventions for autistic students have often focused on teaching self-advocacy skills to individuals. That work has value, but this study provides a structural corrective. Teaching students to speak up means little if the institution punishes them for doing so.
The study’s recommendations are organized around the same six structural barriers its participants identified.
Restoring Epistemic Justice
This study contributed to combating epistemic injustice by both serving as an example of neurodivergent-led research and calling for expanded participation by autistic voices. Autistic researchers analyzing the autistic experience is an act of epistemic repair. It returns interpretive authority to the people whose interpretations have historically been overridden, discounted, and pathologized.
What this study asks of schools, and what epistemic justice demands more broadly, is the harder and more honest alternative: to treat the autistic canary’s signal as data. Instead of asking “How do we get this student to fit in better in this system,” ask “What is this student’s distress telling us about the system itself?”
Share this post Facebook Bluesky Linkedin Email
There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.
By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Ludmila N. Praslova, Ph.D., SHRM-SCP, is a professor of Organizational Psychology at Vanguard University of Southern California.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.
This article is part of the Bringwise Psychology Journal — daily insights on human behavior, mental health, and personal growth.